cannibalcoalition:

eragonaria-sama:

cannibalcoalition:

internutter:

trufflesmushroom:

cannibalcoalition:

opalinkwell:

cannibalcoalition:

I am very seriously having trouble not thinking about the bill that would allow employers to put employees through a genetics test.  I am having trouble seeing the benefits of such a bill. I am having trouble not seeing it as a selfish allowance. I am having trouble not seeing it as literal eugenics. 

You’re having trouble because there is no benefit to employees.  It will only be for the benefit of employers, and will allow them to discriminate.  It’s terrifying…

I’ve been reading lots of articles and trying to get some perspective on it. A spokesperson for HR 1313 said that knowing a person’s genetic history would allow for preventative measures and eventually lower the cost of insurance. 

And I can sort of see that. 

BUT. 

That is a conversation that I should have voluntarily, with my doctor, under no penalty, and kept private. It should not be permissible to sell it, and I should not have to incur a 30% fine for not participating in a ‘wellness activity’ with an unqualified person who may or may not use this information against me. 

Healthcare should be affordable to everyone, regardless of their predictive health and the health of their families. 

Removing the anonymity of genetic information has acutely horrifying implications. 

I know I’m kind of preaching to the choir right now, but like… I can’t get it out of my head. I shouldn’t read this stuff before I go to sleep. 

hello naughty children its GATTACA time

More than that, it could also be an attempt to “catch” trans people. And I know it’s going to have unexpected results…

See, once upon a time, the people running the Olympics thought they could catch cheats by checking the competitors’ chromosomes. IDK why. Maybe they thought some men were sneaking into the women’s contests so they could win gold medals. Whatever.

In order to not appear like sexist shots, they tested EVERY competitor. And they were all set to land like a ton of bricks on any cheats…

BUT…

The results showed quite a surprising amount of MALE competitors had female chromosomes.

So the whole idea was trashed in short order.

(This story comes second hand from MeMum and may be inaccurate)

Here is a story about 

Soundarajan, a female runner who was denied entry to the Olympics because of her Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (which she was unaware of) failed the required genetics testing. Mandatory genetics testing has been removed from the requirements as of 2004, but still is practiced in the event that a competitor is being investigated for a fraudulent claim. 

Intentionally misrepresenting your sex or gender as a means to cheat in sports has happened before. It is not a common method because the risk is very high. It is also… rarely successful in terms of having ‘easier competition.’

The idea that this bill would effectively out trans and intersex  persons at the workplace is just one of the major issues that I have with it. 

There is the very obvious problem of racial bias and the prevalence of white supremacy in our country. I should not need to expound upon why I have a problem with that.

But there is also the major issue of the bill’s claimed purpose: to find congenital conditions and enact ‘preventative measures.’ There are lots of people in the work force who are on the Autism spectrum, who have Down’s Syndrome, Cerebral Palsy… who are capable of working with their symptoms and do their jobs. These are also a target for discrimination and there are employers who are more than willing to justify it. 

If the only benefit to come from this bill is that companies would be able to save more money, then I am unable to find any good in this bill. 

For a good summary, see the Washington Post’s article (linked below, I’m on mobile). This would be straight up breaking the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. This is absolutely ridiculous, and yet another extreme breach of our privacy.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2017/03/11/employees-who-decline-genetic-testing-could-face-penalities-under-proposed-bill/?tid=ss_mail-amp&utm_term=.0f25eafb2d6a

The sponsor of the bill is NC Rep- Virginia Foxx:

2262 Rayburn House Office Building
(202) 225-2071

Co-sponsor-  MI Rep Tim Walberg (Website)

Washington, D.C. Office
2436 Rayburn HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-6276
Fax: (202) 225-6281
Hours: Monday-Friday 9:00AM-5:30PM

Jackson Office
401 W. Michigan Ave.
Jackson, MI 49201
Phone: (517) 780-9075
Fax: (517) 780-9081
Hours: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday 9:00AM-5:00PM
Wednesday 9:00AM-6:00PM

Co-Sponsor- NY Rep Elise M Stefanik

Contact form on website. 

Co-Sponsor- MI Rep Paul Mitchell

Contact form on website. 

queen-of-destruction-nemesis:

shatterstag:

catbountry:

rubykgrant:

kool-aid-jammers:

acreamearedsweeper:

I’m “Look out Ted.”

“JUST FILL THE HOLE, HOLE FILLER”

the fudge is this

Never 4get the Ghost Stories English dub.

For those unaware, Ghost Stories was an anime that was so horrifically bad and generic that when it was planned to be released in English, the VA’s gave up on the script and everybody just decided fuck it, ab lib the entire thing.

It’s basically Cards Against Humanity in the style of an anime Abridged series, but 100% official.

That’s amazing

thessalian:

beekeepercain:

tenadp:

wotseit:

s/o to aces with libido

s/o to aces with kinks

s/o to aces with fantasies

s/o to aces who experience sensual attraction

s/o to aces who like to be sensually intimate with their partners

s/o to aces who like to be sexually intimate with their partners

s/o to aces who aren’t “perfect” asexuals, you are still valid and you are all ace af

I am really not trying to be rude, I just want to understand!! If you enjoy being sexually intimate with a partner, how are you asexual? Sorry if this comes across as offensive, I’m just interested to know!

There are other reasons than specifically wanting to have sex for the sake of having sex. For example, some asexuals want to please their non-asexual partners, and it isn’t necessarily uncomfortable for them, they just don’t specifically desire that particular action. Like, asexuals can still dig the feeling of sexual stimulation, since it is meant to be pleasurable.

It’s like, if there’s cake on the table, but you don’t particularly want cake at that time, or you don’t really care for cake, you can still choose to eat it because even if cake isn’t your favourite or you’re quite full already, it still tastes fine, and your best friend is eating some with you. 

Alternatively, it’s possible to sort of “trade favours”; instead of sexually pleasing their asexual partner who is disinterested in receiving sexually, the non-asexual party might cuddle, kiss and otherwise be physically affectionate with their partner while making love. This’d still count as sexual intimacy, even though only one person in the act is – hopefully – orgasming.

Some asexuals see sex as a way to bond with their partners. Again, the act isn’t specifically interesting to them, but it works as a means to an end – through it, they get to feel closer to their partner.

Asexuality is the absence of sexual attraction, the “I want to bang that” trigger that most people have in response to potential sexual partners. Not the absence of sexual activity itself, which would be celibacy – the choice to not engage in sex, the act. An asexual can have sex and not feel that specific type of attraction to their partner, as attraction is passive and not based in active choice. It doesn’t mean that that partner is disgusting to them, either; they may well be aesthetically attractive to the asexual person (the same way you can appreciate a beautiful statue or a painting without becoming sexually aroused by viewing it) and the asexual person may well desire physical intimacy with them, such as hugging, kissing, cuddling and holding hands. Since not all asexuals are inherently repulsed by sex but merely disinterested in it by default, turning that desire for general closeness into sexual activity where it provides fulfillment of some form to both parties isn’t necessarily paradoxical.

Someone once brought up a fairly good point regarding this subject; non-asexual people also sometimes hook up and have sex with people that aren’t specifically attractive to them. It can still be perfectly consensual and satisfy the needs of both parties, despite the fact that the base attraction wasn’t there. For example, a person who just wants to have sex with someone might go along with a partner they would not otherwise choose, but who simply happens to be available and ready to do the deed with them. Alternatively, a woman might seek to have a baby, and have sex with a partner solely for that purpose, and whether the partner chosen is sexually attractive to them or not isn’t a big factor in the choice. (Plenty of asexual women choose to have sex to have children.) There are multiple reasons to have sex even when you’re not sexually attracted. Specifically for asexuals, the factor of having a non-asexual partner is usually a big motivator to have sex, and other reasons like the ones I explored above may additionally pop up to support that decision.

Finally, some asexuals just really dig orgasms. Most people do. We just don’t have that special someone we wish was delivering them to us, and largely prefer to take care of our own. But when you are in a relationship and that kind of comes as a package deal, some asexuals don’t feel like it’s a bad trade, or at least aren’t violently opposed to the idea. I think most asexuals who do choose to have sex are indifferent to it – it’s not their favourite thing in the world, but it takes care of business.

Best explanation EVER.

firetricking:

bleeply:

u know what’s really nice & makes my day… when people are genuinely nice… like when people take the time to just talk to you about something mundane or wave to you or hold the door for u or just smile like, that’s the good shit

or when you smile at a grumpy looking person and they look away but for a second.. just before their heads turn, you see a soft, shy smile

dtgchbohvgoyfktxrchjbjihn

jokerondeck:

nuevayor:

what was the first show y’all broke up with…you know like the first show you had that was your everything for a good amount of time and then it fucked up so bad that like you felt your heart breaking with sadness, disappointment and hurt and then you vowed never to see it again? i’ll start mine was shame/ess

every time I’ve seen this post it’s been tagged with Supernatural

beyoncepatronus:

who the fuck manages to eat three set separate meals at three set times of the day. who the fuck does that. i eat however much i’m hungry for whenever i’m hungry, which could be anywhere in the range of once a day, six times a day or constantly snacking, depending on the weather, how much i’ve slept, the phase of my menstrual cycle, how annoyed i am, how well i’m dressed, how much work i have to do, how much food i see that day, how gay i’m feeling,

docferdinand:

Whenever people are like “Teen Girls Ruined Sans/Junkrat/Some Other Character by turning him into a sex symbol” I’m like

BOY you’re gonna be REALLY UPSET with what Het Dudes do to EVERY FEMALE CHARACTER THEY CAN GET THEIR GRUBBY HANDS ON