The signs’ embarrassing families

moved-to-aradiiaa:

Aries: An Indiana Jones fangirl, a weeaboo who smokes weed, and a terrorist dressed as an Asian schoolgirl

Taurus: A huge Pokémon fan, a weeaboo with great hair, and the leader of a huge rebellion

Gemini: A hacker obsessed with bees, a clumsy skater boy who curses a lot, and a pilot

Cancer: An angry kid who reads romance novels, a party pooper with pants that go up to his chest, and Jesus with the same pants

Leo: A huntress who writes fluffy fanfiction, a Satan worshipper who looks like a cinnamon roll, and a female version of Tarzan

Virgo: A vampire with a chainsaw, a motherly feminist with badass piercings and tattoos, and a very protective mother

Libra: A blind lawyer who eats chalk, a radical skater girl, and another lawyer who rides a dragon

Scorpio: A pirate, a nerd, and another pirate

Sagittarius: Three robotic engineers who are obsessed with horse dicks

Capricorn: A high clown, a Satan-worshipping clown, and a homicidal clown

Aquarius: Harry Potter, Danny Zuko, and a serial killer who is bad with jokes

Pisces: Barbie, Nicki Minaj, and Hitler

mousathe14:

bugcthulhu:

psshaw:

zahlzeit:

merleawe:

I just really find the fact that the creator of dragonball has stated that Goku canonically cannot feel any kind of love, just ‘companionship’, to be a extremely interesting fact. Like, if his family died he’d be like ‘No!’ and then he’d get over it fairly quickly as if they were only just acquaintances. Same goes with the rest of his friends.

The series creator apparently doesn’t like the anime’s portrayal of Goku. They always cast Goku as a hero, when in the manga he’s really only ‘saving people’ as a side bonus that comes with fighting a stronger opponent. He doesn’t purposefully go in to save anyone unless there is a fight happening at the scene.

So, If Goku hadn’t hit his head, he would’ve just been another Raditz. And it also explains why he’s rather cruel towards Gohan and neglectful towards Chichi.

Apparently Vegeta is the actual exception to his own species. He actually genuinely loves his family, -a rare trait only Goku’s mother was proven to have- whereas Goku is apparently literally unable to have those feelings. It’s kind of ironic; Vegeta is probably the one that would be the most ashamed and resentful to admit he has those kinds of feelings.

Source, if anyone was interested: http://www.kanzenshuu.com/translations/wired-japan-1997-akira-toriyama-interview/

“And also, I myself an extremely twisted person. So if, on a reader’s postcard, it was written “That’s this, and this’ll happen like this”, then I’d deliberately go with a development where that didn’t happen, and if a certain character got fairly popular, I’d deliberately kill him. (laughs)”

As if Dragonball isn’t already great enough.

is anyone really surprised?

No.

I mean, the realization about Vegeta’s a little surprising but Goku? Not. At. All. There’s a reason why everyone calls Piccolo Gohan’s real father.

hollowedskin:

dr-archeville:

ayellowbirds:

andymisandry:

ayellowbirds:

pixiebutterandjelly:

Poison Ivy as a kindergarten teacher

no, but really: flytraps use up a LOT of energy closing their traps. You know a lot of other plants that move that much? Tricking them into closing when there isn’t food there is indeed mean.

B-but… they’re plants… they’re devoid of sentience, right? They don’t “feel,” they’re more like little wind-up machines. Right? They don’t act on instinct, they’re… well… traps. You can’t actually be mean to a plant. Right??

I’m of the opinion that meanness is about the nature of the action, not awareness on the part of the target of the action. 

Tricking them into closing their traps is actually harmful to them, since the energy expended in closing and then re-opening the trap isn’t replenished by having a tasty insect to digest.

I’m of the opinion that meanness is about the nature of the action, not awareness on the part of the target of the action.

jumpingjacktrash:

jumpingjacktrash:

rorleuaisen:

cygnahime:

hellscabanaboy:

hellscabanaboy:

Honestly I just want to live in a big pack of my friends, it’s important to me and I’m just gonna keep trying to figure out some circumstances where I can do it

I feel like that’s basically reasonable but honestly please tell me if this is a thing I’m allowed to think or say or if it’s creepy or weird or utterly socially unacceptable bc I genuinely can’t tell anymore

This is 100% legit and an ideal I personally share.

Sorta living this. Got a few friends that are far away, but I have a little pack that is my community and I love it. 10/10, highly recommended.

northfield nakama is the best tribe i love you all ❤ ❤ ❤

btw, as for being ‘allowed’ to think, more than that, it’s kind of the natural human instinct to live in groups of about 10-30 instead of nuclear family units or large collectives.

don’t try to all live in one building. you’ll drive each other crazy. try to be geographically nearby each other but not on top of each other. the northfield nakama have their own apartments but seebs and i have a big old house that’s everyone’s hangout space.

also don’t try to share everything. i know idealists like to talk about how property is theft, but knowing what stuff you can rely on to be available to you is important to psychological security. from big stuff like covering each other’s rent shortfalls, to little stuff like whether it’s ok to just walk into each other’s kitchens and make a cup of coffee, be up front about what you’re ok with sharing.

consent isn’t just for the bedroom. some people feel loved and cared for if you check up on them frequently, and some people need lots of solitude; don’t assume. make sure you have consent to be in someone’s space. remember that you don’t owe anyone any particular instance of emotional labor, even though being a family involves giving lots of it in general – you can always say “no, i’m not up for that,” and you need to be willing to accept no when other people say it.

found family is real family, and humans are tribal animals. i hope you achieve your friendclan goal. ❤

smallflowernerd:

mousathe14:

raptorific:

I still think it’s hilarious that the reason nobody ever figures out Superman’s secret identity or where he lives or what he does when he’s not saving the planet, is because he already told them all the Kryptonian stuff that can’t be tied to any of his human friends or family. I guarantee you the in-universe wikipedia article on Superman lists his name as Kal-El and the “personal life” section says that he lives full-time at his private fortress of solitude at the north pole. Nobody in the world looks at Clark Kent and thinks “oh my god, maybe he’s superman!” for the same reason nobody ever starts to suspect that their coworker who looks KINDA like Barack Obama is actually secretly Barack Obama – They know who Barack Obama is and know what he does and they know their coworker Greg is Greg and not Barack Obama. They have no reason to assume Barack Obama secretly moonlights as Greg The IT Guy at their workplace even though they’ve never seen Greg and Obama in the same place. At best, “Greg is secretly Obama” would be a running joke at the office, and the same is true at the Daily Planet. “Kal-El of Krypton, who lives in a CRYSTAL PALACE at the NORTH POLE and whose dayjob is SUPERMAN, sometimes puts on a suit and pretends to be a clumsy reporter and lives in a one-bedroom walkup in Metropolis” is a ridiculous concept to anyone who doesn’t already know it’s true

image

[From Max Landis’ amazing “American Alien” series about Superman.]

SO GOOD