I KNOW I’VE POSTED THIS PHOTO BEFORE BUT, TBT, DO YOU GUYS REMEMBER THE TIME A BAT FLEW INTO MY ROOM IN LIKE JANUARY
he came in all cold an sluggish and very little, took a little nappy-nap in my sweater’s pocket till he warmed up, and left
he’s my bro
Okay, please please do not touch bats, especially if they look unwell. The last comment person got very lucky because bats are the #1 carrier of rabies and they have the ability to aerosolize rabies, meaning you don’t necessarily have to be bitten.
When I was in undergrad studying animal science/pre-veterinary medicine, there was a guy in the nearest major city to my school who decided to pick up a sickly looking bat and put it in a box and bring it on public transit. Found out later the bat had rabies. The state+the CDC had to track down every single person who had been on that bus to give them rabies shots. Every. Single. One. It was a public health nightmare.
I know they’re adorable and if you live in a country that is rabies free (which is just the UK and Japan) then ignore this but otherwise PLEASE be careful handling wild bats or any wild animal! Rabies is just one of many zoonotic diseases (diseases that can pass from animals to people and vice versa) and unless you know what you’re doing and what precautions to take, you are putting yourself and others at risk by handling wild animals
^This is why, btw. In the era before germ theory, bats were these creepy scary things that defied miasma theory and where your cousin who touched one might have gone ballistic and then mysteriously died. That’s one of the reasons it got associated with vampire mythos, and why bats’ wings became so ubiquitous in anglo-christian depictions of fallen angels.
I’m looking at screenshots of this horde of furious girls and women destroying Joss Whedon on twitter and it’s so great
Motherfucker you knew you were a misogynist and a fraud in 2002 when you wrote the autobiographical Buffy episode about Andrew the filmmaker fetishizing the pain and hero stories of the house full of women who despise him, and now it’s finally coming crashing down on you and happening in real life.
I sincerely hope some of those girls calling him a piece of shit and a trash can and demanding, “fight me” shook him; this has been his deepest fear about his behavior towards women for over a decade now, but he hasn’t made a change, and he’s always known on some level that he deserves to be hated for it.
BUFFY: Are you still filming me? Stop.
ANDREW: But it’s a valuable record. A-an important document for the ages. ‘A Slayer in Action.’
BUFFY: ‘A Nerd in Pain.’ Would they like that? Cause we could do that.
BUFFY: When your blood pours out it might save the world. What do you think about that? Does it buy it all back? Are you redeemed?
ANDREW: No.
Ugh ok ok I actually have a ridiculous amount of words about this (hi ocelot, can I post those emails from 2012??) But I wanted to say that this… idk. This has been a long time coming for Joss and it’s absolutely a bed he made for himself, and it makes me gratified on a brutal visceral level to see it coming back to bite him, but a lot of that anger is watching an artist I loved curdle into his own self-hate and turn into the kind of awful man he used to write about. Joss…Joss has had a recurrent fantasy of self-loathing and shame about his treatment of female characters and actresses that started, afaik, in season 6 of Buffy, with the introduction of the three nerd villains Warren, Jonathan, and Andrew.
The initial patriarchal villains of the Buffyverse were men who abused women using either brute strength or political power: Angelus, the Watchers, the Mayor. The three nerds introduced another kind of misogynistic male antagonist that grew to dominate and completely consume Joss’s work in the 00s: the nerdy, story-obsessed guy who used his intelligence and mastery of technology to abuse and control strong, heroic women. Nerdy men who, like Joss, either created or tampered with the women they wanted total control over, either by building androids or altering existing women, usually via invasive medical torture. Joss the writer invents the character of Buffy while having workplace clashes with her actress Sarah Michelle Gellar; Andrew, Warren, and Jonathan drug their girlfriends into compliance and create the BuffyBot to obey their will. This villain character would show up again and again in Joss’ later works: the scientist who had, thanks to his technical and storytelling skills, been given custody by higher powers over women who would normally be far out of their range of influence. And, uncomfortably, all of the actors cast for these roles bore a striking physical resemblance to Joss.
When Joss aired “Storyteller”, I was surprised and impressed. It was penned by Jane Espenson, Buffy’s strongest staff writer, and was a story about Andrew the Joss doppelganger filming the house of potential Slayers for a series he called “Buffy, Slayer of the Vampyres.” A major theme of “Storyteller” was Andrew’s intrusive use of the Buffy cast’s personal lives and pain to make a good story, his refusal to acknowledge their privacy, and possibly, as Anya kept insisting, to use his videos as masturbation material. It seemed like a huge moment of self- awareness and self-reflection about the relationship Joss had to the real and fictional women who worked for him, especially given the conflicts he had at the time with actresses like Charisma Carpenter over her character Cordelia and personal bodily autonomy (pregnancy). It was self-critical and raw and I was incredibly proud of Joss for being willing to go there in such a public way.
Buffy ended, and Andrew redeemed himself, but the misogynist-nerd-self-loathing metastory intensified. One of the aspects of the Three Nerds villain arc that had always made me profoundly uncomfortable was the way Joss positioned the boys’ nerdy pursuits and lack of traditional masculinity– not just their treatment of women– as something inherently repulsive. Viewers were supposed to be disgusted by the sight of three dorky boys nerding out over Star Wars figurines. Buffy and the house full of potential slayers call Andrew vile names for being a nerd, not in response to his behavior; by the end of his run, I felt the urge to protect Andrew, not from the girls, but from Joss, who was clearly using him as a punching bag onto which he was projecting his own self-loathing. (Eventually Joss was quoted saying that Andrew was, as had been hinted, gay, but would remain in the closet indefinitely “because it’s funny,” something that horrified and enraged fans, but which Joss seemed to view, appallingly, as as an ultimate emasculation.)
The next major Joss project was Dollhouse, with evil scientist and Joss lookalike Topher Brink programming, manipulating, and violating various women into playacting roles he’d scripted for them. It was such a blatant story about Joss and his actresses it was difficult to watch. Like, My Feminism Is Just An Excuse To Exploit Hot Actresses, I Am Such A Disgusting Creature!!! Coming soon to the CW! His next project, the webseries I Am So Horrible And My Feminism Is A Sham, featuring NPH as the Joss stand-in, was similarly cringeworthy.
A big outlier here is Wash, from Firefly and Serenity, who almost fit the pattern, but not quite, and that “not quite” was enough of a problem that, like the similar character Oz, he had to be written out of the story. Alan Tudyk had the same general physical resemblance to Joss and the same dress sense as Andrew, Topher, and Billy Horrible. His dinosaur theater sessions looked and sounded like the action figure games the Trio played, and the blurb for Joss’s media company, Mutant Enemy. But unlike all the other nerdy blond men of the Whedonverse, Wash was in a equal and loving relationship with the strong soldier woman he adored. Other characters in the series were preoccupied with the traditional gender role imbalance in Wash and Zoe’s marriage and questioned whether Wash felt emasculated by his wife being stronger than he was, but both Wash and Zoe were completely above and untouched by it. She was a warrior woman and she was married to a dorky guy who told stories and who wasn’t the most physically powerful man on her crew. She could have broken him in half with her pinky and they loved and respected each other and had a happy, healthy marriage. This was, somehow, too much for Joss to handle, and so Wash had to die.
When venting about Joss I want to say that the problem isn’t that Joss was always terrible, or that all of his work was tainted or had a poisonous message from the beginning. It wasn’t; Buffy was and still is incredibly important; it had the kind of powerful emotional intelligence that burrows into your heart and stays there and I think it still stands by itself, years later. Buffy still stands. Charles Gunn still stands. Anya still stands. When my mother passed away last year, I watched “The Body” like a ritual, and I know I’m not the only person to have done something similar. That canon isn’t going anywhere.
The problem is that at some point in his career, Joss became so intent on the masochistic fantasy of being hated by strong women for being a nerd that he spent a decade writing stories about violating those women to ensure they would hate him. I wish Joss had ended that obsession with “Storyteller.” I wish he had talked about the feelings that made him want to make “Dollhouse” with his therapist and tried to make things right with Charisma Carpenter instead of turning those particular personal demons into a bad TV show. I wish the ideas of intimacy and equality weren’t so threatening to him that he had to write men like Oz and Wash out of existence instead of trying to evolve into them. I wish he hadn’t let himself fall into that pit of destructive self-loathing back in 2002, and I wish he hadn’t stayed there so long that he started to turn that hate outward onto the women he perceived as loathing and rejecting him. I wish he hadn’t turned, in twenty years, from the man who wanted to see the blonde girl in the horror movie survive and thrive into the rich bastard who thought it was funny to call Natasha Romanoff a cunt on IMAX and who called her a monster for being the victim of medical abuse. I’m still laughing angrily at Joss being driven off twitter by a mob of angry, betrayed female fans, because wow does he ever deserve it, but man, Joss. It didn’t have to be that way.
also let’s not forget Xander Harris who was a horrible misogynist from the very first episode of Buffy and very much a Joss Whedon self-insert
Xander who was never once called out for his bs and continued to behave horribly and treat the women in his life like property, who went on to have fantasies about the Potentials most of whom were minors… Xander who left Anya at the alter and then acted as though he had any right to be angry with her for sleeping with Spike…
honestly I could go on but this is already a long post and I’m tired
Actually, I think this may be the best part of the evilicious finale.
Alton: “Alright, so here is your blade! You gotta cut down the coconut! ”
Chef Yaku: “I’m happy to let him pay $26,000 for a coconut tree. Because I’m tall, I just reach straight up and start grabbing coconuts off the tree. And I don’t really have time to look for a tool and open them…”[smashes coconuts] “Man, you think a stupid coconut gon’ stop me!”
Other chef: “This dude’s like smashing through these coconuts! What am I up against here?!” [to Chef Yaku] “Ah, man…”
Ways you can tell someone is from a ‘strict’ household on reddit. All of these are signs of abuse.
All of this.
For me, the revelation was this comic by Matt Groening from the Childhood is Hell collection
It was the part about “Never Tell Anyone What Goes On In This Family” that hit me. I got that EXACT LINE VERBATIM from my parents on several occasions. Back when I was little, I guess I considered it as “I suppose they just value privacy or something” but only in my later years did I realize how much it could be manipulated for ill intent.
Lately it occurred to me that, in all the “Humans are Weird/Great/Space Orcs” genre of posts I’ve seen, I haven’t seen any yet that deal with the relatively low level of sex-related morphological difference in human bodies, compared to other species. Like, things as simple as the length of a particular human’s hair, or the pitch of their voice, or their vocabulary can confuse other humans, with brains evolved to analyze these differences, as to the sex of said particular human. History is filled with examples of men and women posing as the other through the simple expedients of clothing and grooming. For that matter, history is filled with examples of people assigned male or female at birth living as the other through the same expedients. And then there’s all the complexities of gender presentation and identity. And then there’s all the ways environment mucks up conventional “gender differences”. And then there’s the obvious fact that, the minute technology allows humans a new way to experiment with gender and sexual anatomy, they jump at it.
I think, ironically, aliens might end up being better at just referring to people as they wish to be referred to if only because, to them, all humans look basically alike and it’s just easier to ask each person and stick with what you’re told. I’d imagine they’d view all the gender-enforcement common to some human societies as being pretty ridiculous and impenetrable.
no like morphologically humans are very similar to each other. we have only two states of physical polymorphism and there both sexual and have very few differences. Apart from that the only obvious differences between two groups of humans are skin color, hair color, and eye color, and any human can have any combination of this three traits. Most insects have three kinds of polymorphism (worker, breeder, and male) at a minimum often much more( soldier, architect, queen servant etc.) all of which have traits that only they can posses. Many furry pack predators have dozens of different fur patterns and colors, many creatures have uniques patterns of stripes or dots, etc. many species can change physical sex characteristics, skin color and even skin texture at will often as a form of communication or in response to external stimuli. We have to have an entire global fashion industry to come close to the diversity that can be found in other species, and those changes are temporary and superficial, and would at best make it even harder for an alien to distinguish between two humans. We on the other hand can identity and remember a stunning number of faces, body builds, voices, hairstyles, etc. even though the details separating any two of them are very slight and easily missed. Even when many of the other identifiers are temporary, fluid, and superficial.
“I need loyalty, I expect loyalty,” Trump told then FBI Director
James Comey in January – even though FBI directors are supposed to be
independent of a president, and Comey was only 4 years into a 10 year term.
Comey testified before the Senate that Trump tried to
“create some sort of patronage relationship,” based on personal loyalty.
After Comey refused and continued to investigate possible
connections between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives, Trump fired him.
Preet
Bharara, who had been the United States Attorney for the Southern District of
New York, said Trump tried to create the same sort of patronage
relationship with him that he did with Comey.
Bharara’s office had been investigating
Trump’s secretary of health and human services, Tom Price, and also looking into Russian money-laundering allegations against
Deutsche Bank, Trump’s principal private lender.
In
his first and best-known book, “The Art of
the Deal,”Trump distinguished between
integrity and loyalty – and made clear he preferred loyalty.
Trump
compared attorney Roy Cohn – Senator Joe McCarthy’s attack dog who became Trump’s
mentor – to “all the
hundreds of ‘respectable’ guys who
make careers out of boasting about their uncompromising integrity but have
absolutely no loyalty … What I
liked most about Roy Cohn was that he would do just the opposite.”
As
president, Trump continues to prefer loyalty over integrity.
Although most of his Cabinet still don’t have top deputies in
place, the White House has installed senior aides to monitor their
loyalty. As Barry Bennett, a former Trump campaign adviser, explained to the
Washington Post, “they’re functioning as the White House’s voice and ears in
these departments.”
Last Monday, the White House invited reporters in to watch
what was billed as a meeting of Trump’s Cabinet. After Trump
spoke, he asked each of the Cabinet members around the table to briefly comment.
Their statements were what you might expect from toadies surrounding a two-bit
dictator.
“We
thank you for the opportunity and blessing to serve your agenda,” said Chief of
Staff Reince Priebus. “Greatest privilege of my life, to serve as vice
president to a president who’s keeping his word to the American people,” said
Vice President Mike Pence. “You’ve set the exact right message,” said Attorney
General Jeff Sessions, adding, “The response is fabulous around the country.”
When I was sworn in
as Bill Clinton’s Secretary of Labor, I took an oath to
“support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies,
foreign and domestic.” I didn’t pledge
loyalty to Bill Clinton, and I wouldn’t have participated in such a fawning display.
That oath is a
pledge of loyalty to our system of government – not to a powerful individual. It
puts integrity before personal loyalty. It’s what it means to have a government
of laws.
But
Trump has filled
his administration with people more loyal to him than they are to America.
His top advisers are his
daughter, Ivanka, and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner.
To run his legal defense and be his spokesman on the
investigation into collusion with Russian operatives, Trump has hired Marc
Kasowitz.
Kasowitz is not an expert in criminal
or constitutional law. His only apparent qualification is his utter loyal to
Trump.
He’s been Trump’s personal legal fixer for almost
two decades – representing him in his failed libel lawsuit against a journalist, the Trump
University fraud case that ended in January with a $25 million settlement
from Trump, and candidate
Trump’s response to allegations of sexual assault by
multiple women last year.
Kasowitz called the New York Times article
containing interviews with the women “per
se libel” and demanded “a full and immediate retraction and
apology” (which the Times refused).
Kasowitz
has said he played a central role in the
firing of Preet Bharara. Kasowitz told Trump, “This guy is going to get you,”
according to a person familiar with Kasowitz’s account.
Now, Kasowitz is taking on a public role. Bypassing
the White House Counsel, he instructed White House aides to discuss the
investigation as little as possible, and advised them about whether they should
hire private lawyers.
The
horrifying reality is that in Trumpworld, there is no real “public” role. It’s all
about protecting and benefiting Trump.
When
loyalty trumps integrity, we no longer have a government of laws. We have a
government by and for Trump.
The brain is an organ. Mental illnesses are illnesses of that organ. Brain scans show that there is a physical difference between a healthy brain and a sick brain. Telling someone “You’re not really sick. It’s all in your head.” is like telling someone with asthma “It’s not real, it’s all in your lungs.” The brain is an organ that can malfunction as much as any other organ.
MY FAVORITE BIT IS HOW FAST SHE REALIZES SHE CAN’T CHARGE IT BLADE FIRST, SHE’S GONNA HAVE TO BE STANDING VERY VERTICALLY TO FIT IN THE SPACE, SO SHE ANGLES THE SWORD UP– WHILE KEEPING IT AS READY AS POSSIBLE FOR AS LONG AS POSSIBLE–THEN SWITCHES SMOOTHLY INTO LEADING WITH THE SHIELD ONCE SHE’S IN TOO TIGHT A SPACE FOR THE SWORD TO BE EFFECTIVE ANYMORE. IF AN ENEMY WAS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THAT DOOR, OR IF THE DOOR *WAS* AN ENEMY, SHE’D BE IMPECCABLY READY FOR ACTION EVERY SINGLE MOMENT OF THIS EXIT.
THAT IS WHAT’S SO COOL AND FUN ABOUT THIS GAG. DIANA IS AS MUCH A TRAINED WARRIOR WHEN SHE’S GOING THROUGH A REVOLVING DOOR AS SHE IS WHEN SHE’S THROWING A TANK.