Ya MCM said ew when you told him you were on your period.
He’s 27.
That shit is forever nasty lol
How
Bruh like what are you supposed to do with it? Play in it? Come on now
Ya MCM thinks periods are nasty because he can’t play in it. He was born in 1986.
periods arent nasty but woman arent supposed to have them its actually poor diet that causes them look it up just a fun fact
Ya MCM thinks periods are a result of a poor diet. He’s over 18.
This nigga thinks periods are like optional. And was confident enough to try to tell a woman with a vagina that that was a fact. The internet is wild bruh.
W i l d. and he deadass.
…………
I’m so glad I had comprehensive health classes in school. I couldn’t imagine being that dense
Actually, he’s not wrong. For Black women, a period is called such because it should LITERALLY appear to be a drop of blood, hence a PERIOD. Heavy blood flow is caused from hemorrhaging in the system, which isn’t natural. That’s why it hurts, as I would imagine. It really does involve diet.
Ya MCM thinks black women menstruate in a different way than other women.
I am literally going to end my life. It’s called a period as in period of time. A period of time I wish your mothers had not missed
i am genuinely having an out of body experience
Sometimes I see this post and think to myself it can’t be real, but yes there are thousands and thousands of people in the world who genuinely believe woman shouldn’t get periods it’s our “diet” this is a thing.
Just want to remind everyone that homeboy up there believes that because another man told him so, thus it must be true.
it’s actually called a menstrual cycle so the period = drop of blood is a REACH my guy
How are some men so fucking stupid
tangential, but period related fun fact: if you are on the pill, your period CAN be optional, because you can skip the placebos and just take the real pills all the time. i am told there’s no downside to this.
I learned from tv that periods are supposed to be blue. Any other color, someone forgot to say their prayers i guess
you know that line about “if a soldier forces you to carry his pack for one mile, carry it for two”?
there was a thing where roman soldiers could demand that civilians carry their gear, but only for a mile. obviously people did not like this. they had shit to be doing. they did not want to be some rando’s pack mule any more than people today would. also, it was kind of scary, because here’s this guy with a weapon saying “you’re my fetchit bitch or else.” and you had to go off with him wherever he wanted, up to one mile.
but jesus was all about the nonviolent resistance. i mean, sure, you could run, but then maybe they see you later and point you out to the cops, it’s a small world. maybe they chase you down and kick you around a bit. hell, maybe they show you their stabs. you gonna bring a sword of your own and make a duel out of it? that’s even worse than just carrying the damn pack.
so what you do is, you just keep carrying it.
at first they don’t notice the mile’s up. but then it starts feeling kind of long. they find themselves waiting for you to call time. but you don’t. you just keep going. they start checking the landmarks. are they lost? are they dreaming? are you stealing their shit? you can’t be, can you, since you’re right there. but you’re still HOLDING it. they’re wondering if they’re ever gonna get their centurion undies back. they could ask, but waitasec, you’re carrying their stuff, which is what they said to do, so that’s good, right?
but why are you still HERE?
are you trying to be friends? are you an assassin? are you a vet just helping a brother out? are you up to something? are you crazy? are you sleepwalking? are THEY sleepwalking? WHAT IS EVEN GOING ONNN NN N
at mile marker 2 you set the pack down and go “have a nice day!” and bail
and next time they think of handing their shit to some stranger, maybe they think again.
Yeh but you see it goes further than that. Roman law stated that any soldier could tell them to carry their pack for a mile, and that poor random person HAD do to it. But here’s the thing
They could only carry it for a mile, and if they carried it further (the assumption being that the soldier kept forcing the person to keep carrying it) the soldier could get in HUUUUUGE trouble.
So this soldier and some civilian (I believe it had to be someone who was not a Roman citizen?? I can’t quite remember) are walking along, and they hit the mile marker. The soldier demands his pack be returned.
“No no, allow me, I’m not tired!” Says the civilian, and keeps on walking.
The soldier keeps asking, maybe rather threatening, but the civilian just keeps kindly insisting to help, it’s not a problem, let me help you, etc. and continues walking.
It then gets to the point that the soldier has to be like “Hey, man c’mon, I could really get in trouble for this…please give it back”
What has just happened was a serious change in power dynamics. It went from the soldier being in control of the situation and treating the civilian as lesser, to the civilian being in control, and the soldier treating the civilian as an equal.
What Jesus was teaching was not to lay down and submit to authority, but how to passively command respect, to be treated as an equal.
I’m
It’s amazing how so many Christians have no clue just how radical Jesus was and how much they wouldn’t actually like him if he was around today.
Jesus is around today! He is the Black Lives Matter movement, he’s the Women’s March, he’s the Dakota Access Pipeline protesters, he’s Planned Parenthood, he’s Pride, all of these protests and voices of the marginalized are the same message: treat marginalized people as human beings.
And yes, the people in power still fucking hate him and everything he stood for. It’s just a really sick irony that they claim to be his number one fans while shitting all over everything he fought so hard for.
there’s a reason he said “love your neighbor as yourself” – the point is that other people are the same as you. we’re all in this together.
and to paraphrase pratchett, there’s no sin that doesn’t boil down to treating people as things.
jesus and satan are the same guy in different hats
god created satan in order to have him rule the inferno, because he already had hell built and ready to go before the Fall. if we assume that jesus and satan are the same person, after suffering for centuries lucifer is allowed a chance to atone for his sins and becomes a human being, dying voluntarily on the cross in order to return to god’s side. this completes his penance (for the crime of sneaking out of hell to tempt humankind into falling from grace and being banished from eden.) the archangel gabriel is seated at the left hand of the father (god) and jesus/satan is seated at his right hand; essentially, humans were god’s project from the getgo, and so lucifer’s job was tormenting the damned, before there were even any damned, and gabriel’s job is, sort of, to punish the living. gabriel shares that role frequently with the archangel michael, who carries a flaming sword and is often depicted crushing serpents with his heel, like the virgin mary. the serpent here does not particularly represent jesus/satan, but rather the embodiment of the original sin.
if we accept this metanarrative, then the gospels become much more interesting. for example – it becomes obvious that jesus must have arranged for judas to betray him in advance, thus condemning himself to death and requiring judas to repent in the desert for the supposed betrayal (really a sacrifice of the self; judas gives up the companionship of the apostles, becomes a secret martyr for christ, etc) before he can rejoin christ in heaven. we are meant to understand that we are all judas, and in doing so, understand that the holiest of men can still be liars. we are begged to consider that perhaps the scriptures themselves are littered with lies, inserted here and there by translators and monarchs. in fact, the actions and life of judas iscariot become a sort of pageant for the fall and redemption of christ/satan; judas becomes the most christlike of the apostles.
just moving along like everyone else 