latining:

ackermom:

julius caesar’s assassination was the last time everyone in a group project did their part

According to Eutropius, there were sixty senators present. According to Suetonius, Julius Caesar was stabbed twenty-three times, with only one of them being fatal.

TL;DR: At least thirty-seven senators slacked the fuck off and only one out of sixty put in any real effort. #groupwork

pipkrakes:

wellntruly:

Astonishing things that are happening so far in Master and Commander:

I don’t know what I was expecting, given that the entire world plus the back of my copy sincerely calls this the “Aubrey-Maturin novels,” which we all know is just because they hadn’t thought to use a /, but still I was not prepared for this book to literally open with a meet cute. Specifically, a meet cute wherein our solid sea-honed ~presence~ of a British Royal Navy Officer is so overcome by the beauty of the music recital he’s attending that he cannot help banging his fist upon his knee to the melody, and is promptly and devastatingly shushed by this intense little slip of an Irish physician, upon which Jack Aubrey’s response to being sassed by Stephen Maturin is to have even more feelings than he was already having about the music, and then less than 24 hours later run up to him in the street, effuse how very sorry he is, and invite him to become his best friend. And THEN it comes out that this delicate doctor is actually wasting away on account of the patient he’d come to Menorca to treat having died without paying him, and is now sleeping in the fucking abandoned ruins of a chapel up on a hill and calling all his animal roommates by their Latinate names and hasn’t really eaten in god knows when, and Jack is like OMG NO, OMG NO COME LIVE ON MY NEW SLOOP WITH ME AND I’LL FEED YOU ALL THE TIME, and Stephen’s like Could I Possibly? and Jack’s like YES!!, and then rushes around getting his snug little boat ready while daydreaming about when he can get Stephen aboard and at last have someone with whom he can share his thoughts and joys and feelings about beautiful music. And then in Classic™ Plot™ Jack sends a messenger to tell Stephen that he’s going to miss their next meal because he’s taking his ship out for a test sail before they embark, but Stephen DOESN’T GET THE MESSAGE and comes down to the docks with his wee bag to see Jack’s ship sailing away and thinks, I paraphrase but only barely: “this is what I get for thinking I might at last have something nice, I cannot believe I allowed myself to lower my defenses so completely because now I am Heartbroken,” and palely glares the fuck out of the poor kid who finally rushes up to give him the message that Jack’ll be back to fetch him in a couple hours.

Other things that have happened include three four separate mentions of, to use the parlance, sodomy, including the Confirmed Gay aboard having already developed a crush on golden-haired Commander Aubrey. Meanwhile our absolutely hapless Dr. Maturin is belowdecks cracking his head into a low beam so hard he sees stars and then valiantly pretending he’s not dazed when Jack bounds down to happily offer him eggs and bacon and coffee.

And then the other 30% of this is long streams of sailing words that I do not know yet. I AM HAVING THE BEST TIME.

#it is an absolute joy seeing someone read this for the first time

prokopetz:

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

tharook:

quasi-normalcy:

saathiray:

buttstothemoon:

quasi-normalcy:

What if, and hear me out, in stead of constantly telling Star Trek stories about science vessels that are “reconfigured to be vessels of war”, we tried telling a Star Trek story about a science vessel that is a vessel of science?

What about a war vessel that was reconfigured to be a vessel of science? Those are wayyyyyyyy more common in real life.

“What the hell is this place?”
“Map says this used to be the ship’s armory. This is where they kept their warheads.”
“This is where we’re keeping the busted LCMS stuff.”
“We…we really can just get new ones.”
“But what we NEEEEEED them for parts?”
“Uh.”
“Start putting the LC pumps here. Don’t tell the captain.”

Or a ship that they use to explore particularly dense plasma nebulae because it has a thick hull and reinforced shielding to withstand Jem’Hadar attacks or the like.

“Are those quantum torpedoes!?”

“Negative. Well, affirmative. Well, they were quantum and they are torpedoes, but they have been retrofitted for probe deployment.”

“What happened to the payloads?”

“They have been repurposed for experimental generation of SUSY particles from vacuum.”

THIS SOUNDS LIKE IT WOULD BE SO NEAT 😀

The thing that gets me about this proposal is that it’s basically canon that Federation vessels are absurdly overpowered compared to just about anything else in space, to the point that a Federation science vessel can tangle with multiple dedicated warships from just about any other faction and reasonably expect to come out on top. Like, they’re packing “sampling lasers” that can drill holes through planets.

If that’s what you get when a science vessel guns up, what on Earth does it look like when you go the other way? We’re talking about a continuum of force where “enough directed energy to crack a planet in half” is your baseline.

(Of course, the reasonable answer is “they take out all the big guns when they convert it to a science vessel, because trying to repurpose planet-cracking firepower for research purposes is deranged”, but where’s the fun in that?)

sometimesophie:

koiotchka:

iamshadow21:

latkelyclintbarton:

adreadfulidea:

roachpatrol:

princess-neville:

The way that we learn about Helen Keller in school is an absolute outrage. We read “The Miracle Worker”- the miracle worker referring to her teacher; she’s not even the title character in her own story. The narrative about disabled people that we are comfortable with follows this format- “overcoming” disability. Disabled people as children.

Helen Keller as an adult, though? She was a radical socialist, a fierce disability advocate, and a suffragette. There’s no reason she should not be considered a feminist icon, btw, and the fact that she isn’t is pure ableism- while other white feminists of that time were blatent racists, she was speaking out against Woodrew Wilson because of his vehement racism. She supported woman’s suffrage and birth control. She was an anti-war speaker. She was an initial donor to the NAACP. She spoke out about the causes of blindness- often disease caused by poverty and poor working conditions. She was so brave and outspoken that the FBI had a file on her because of all the trouble she caused.

Yet when we talk about her, it’s either the boring, inspiration porn story of her as a child and her heroic teacher, or as the punchline of ableist, misogynistic jokes. It’s not just offensive, it’s downright disgusting.

the reason the story stops once hellen keller learns to talk is no one wanted to listen to what she had to say

how’s that for a fucking punchline

It’s not that I disagree that we should all be aware of what a badass Helen Keller became, because she had a long and amazing career as an activist and yes, a feminist hero. It’s that somehow when people talk about the ableism of the way Helen’s story is told they always seem to forget this: Anne Sullivan, her teacher, was blind. Seriously. From Wikipedia:

“When she was only five years old she contracted a bacterial eye disease known as trachoma, which created painful infections and over time made her nearly blind.[2] When she was eight, her mother passed away and her father abandoned the children two years later for fear he could not raise them on his own.[2] She and her younger brother, James (“Jimmie”), were sent to an overcrowded almshouse in Tewksbury, Massachusetts (today part of Tewksbury Hospital). He, who suffered a debilitating hip ailment, died three months into their stay. She remained at the Tewksbury house for four years after his death, where she had eye operations that offered some short-term relief for her eye pain but ultimately proved ineffective.[3]“

Eventually some operations did restore part of her eyesight, but by the end of her life she was entirely blind. Also:

“Due to Anne losing her sight at such a young age she had no skills in reading, writing, or sewing and the only work she could find was as a housemaid; however, this position was unsuccessful.[2] Another blind resident staying at the Tewksbury almshouse told her of schools for the blind. During an 1880 inspection of the almshouse, she convinced an inspector to allow her to leave and enroll in the Perkins School for the Blind in Boston, where she began her studies on October 7, 1880.[2] Although her rough manners made her first years at Perkins humiliating for her, she managed to connect with a few teachers and made progress with her learning.[2] While there, she befriended and learned the manual alphabet from Laura Bridgman, a graduate of Perkins and the first blind and deaf person to be educated there.”

So Anne Sullivan, disabled and born into serious poverty, learns the manual alphabet from a deaf and blind friend; passes that alphabet on to her deaf and blind student. This isn’t the story of an abled-bodied teacher swooping in to ‘save’ a disabled child; it’s a series of disabled women helping each other. Helen Keller’s story is the story not of one badass disabled woman, but of two. Anne and Helen were lifelong friends; Anne died holding Helen’s hand. 

Also is there a book called “The Miracle Worker”? I thought that was the movie/movies based on “The Story of My Life” by Helen Keller. But I could be wrong. And I didn’t learn any of this in school in general but that’s neither here nor there. 

I can recommend the ‘62 version of “The Miracle Worker” with Anne Bancroft and Patty Duke. It’s blatant about Sullivan’s impoverished background and eye problems – her rage on Helen’s behalf isn’t abstract at all, it’s very, very personal. And that’s the most amazing thing about this movie: Anne and Helen are the angriest people on earth. I have no idea if that was erased from the remakes but in the original they are both allowed to have a ton of anger about what has been done to them and what they have been denied. 

Anyway, I’ve rambled enough. Here’s a picture of Helen Keller meeting Charlie Chaplin:

image

omfg I am so mad right now because not only did the kids biography of Helen Keller I read when I was younger erase all her activism, but it very explicitly completely erased anything about Anne being blind herself.

There were scenes of her WATCHING Helen from across the room or yard, and it was all very “oh my, I just MUST save this poor little disabled girl, no other deaf blind person has EVER BEEN EDUCATED and basically it was awful and shitty.

I think everyone should read Helen and Teacher. It’s an absolute brick of a book, hundreds of pages, but it is wonderful. It’s about their whole lives, right up to Helen’s death in old age. It talks about Helen’s feminism, socialism, and campaigning for everything from equal rights to sexual health. Helen Keller was not a syrupy, greeting card girl who existed to make able people feel warm and fuzzy, she was a tireless academic, political activist and writer. She was making noise about the issues she cared about from the moment her partnership with Annie Sullivan began, and she never stopped.

Amazing! I was unaware that Anne was blind as well. Thanks for reaching me something!

I haven’t read these other sources so I don’t know how they would compare, but the biography I read as a child was The World at Her Fingertips by Joan Dash. It covers all of the territory discussed above and had a really clear, easy-to-follow language and narrative that made it really accessible to me even as a kid. So it might be a good starting point for kids to learn about Helen Keller. 

wayhaughtt:

wayhaughtt:

this was too powerful and moving to only post gifs of it.

the context is that the blonde woman on her phone is the boss of the three women holding hands. the woman holding the scales is a rape victim and survivor who never got justice but holds the scales of justice for a metaphorical purpose to bring awareness to the injustices of the system. the only people who can hold the scales are other survivors.

orestian:

what if mituna’s sacrifice was allowing the helmsman to take his mind / the helmsman’s freedom after death was to travel through the dream bubbles and through time, and through the gateway to that failed session – to inherit the body of his parallel self, after the end of his universe. what if that was the bargain mituna struck to save what he could of their session