Do you see any correlations between certain classes/aspects and MBTI/enneagram types? Figured maybe I could get pointed in the direction of my true God Tier by comparing it to some of my other personality types. ^^’

dahniwitchoflight:

dahniwitchoflight:

 not really, because they describe and talk about different things about a person

MBTI focuses on the sort of functions for how you take in, or use or process information, its more of a, how your brain currently likes to do things described as different functions like introverted sensing, or introverted feeling, or extroverted sensing, or extroverted thinking and etc in different orders, combinations and pairs, its how you think about and view things, which sounds like it could be connected to classpect on the surface

but the difference lies in this: MBTI can change over time as your functions grow and develop, and even your type may change over time based on how you grow and develop these 8 different functions and how you use them the best, or which pairs or ‘loops’ you use more, but its based always on your current form of what you are now

Classpect is never really about the current self, a lot of people assume this tho which is where i think the association with MBTI comes from, but really Classpect is about what you WANT to become, rather than what you are currently

God tiering is supposed to be a journey of growth and discovery, and the god tier itself is like this end goal post that you want to achieve in the future that describes not just “you” but the best version of you, you at your greatest, achieving your best, being the best you that ever could be by achieving what you want to achieve out of life

so its more, MBTI is place you are currently in your journey, Classpect is the End Goal Post

so trying to decide a god tier based on the MBTI I think is not accurate way to do it, simply for the fact that they are describing different parts of a person that may or may not be the same

like, its not set in stone that who you are now is who you will want to be, in fact its more likely that who you are now wont be exactly like the person that you wish to become eventually (tho it can happen with people who’ve had their life together since kindergarten, and dont really have much of a journey of self discovery as a sidewalk of self discovery lol)

#your mbti type doesnt change lmao

it honestly can actually, because MBTI describes your way of doing things, your personality, and people’s personalities can in fact change over long periods of time, our brains have plasticity/we aren’t stagnant and etc

MBTI explains this though as you developing your different inferior functions, instead of just your dominant ones

heres the problem with that though: there are 16 types based on the order of only 4 out of 8 functions, some types share all of the same functions, but simply in a different order of strength, so what happens when for example an INTJ who has (Ni> Te> Fi> Se) and happens to develop/change/grow over time so that their Se is stronger than their Fe? or their Fi stronger than their Ni? and now their order of functions is Fi > Se > Ni > Te? which is the order of functions for an ISFP?

Did they develop fully as an INTJ? or did they become an ISFP? are you doomed to be forever immature and unable to grow with inferior functions or can you change your type over time? how can you tell them apart if an already fully developed person takes an MBTI test? How can you determine the difference based only on their behavior alone? you can’t, you have to use some sort of measurable data

which brings up the other problem that nobody really brings up, which is that none of MBTI is based on any sort of observable real world data based on any of the functions, theres no actual data, theres no brains scans showing clearly that “this brain is a sensor vs an intuitor” you cannot tell because it isnt grounded in the physical reality of the brain, unlike mental illness or conditions of the brain, or things like sociopathy, which you can actaually see physical differences in the brains that reflect the observable differences

Instead Its all based on a person’s personal observations of people’s behavior and theorized classifications of behaviours, its all purely outside observations, no internal data. Its a theoretical framework that has yet to be proven, or connected to physical reality